Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGL9_ohxMBq04N8qwn-vEaaan2N-06FaXsTz9+seDddN3g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:32 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
<k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> Sorry, are you tests autoprepare-16.patch I have sent in the last e-mail?
> I can not reproduce the problem with building documentation:

+      <term><varname>autoprepare_threshold</varname> (<type>integer/type>)

The problem is that "<type>integer/type>".  (Missing "<").  There more
than one of those.  Not sure why that doesn't fail for you.

> Also autoporepare-16.patch doesn't include any junk
>
> src/include/catalog/pg_proc.dat.~1~

Oops, yeah, sorry for the noise.  I did something stupid in my apply script.

-- 
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Next
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting