Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGLHDYYENrn0VhEDL4PmWj-tqBBKBzC-6L+VWdOvHoLxdA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

test deadlock-simple              ... ok           20 ms
test deadlock-hard                ... ok        10624 ms
test deadlock-soft                ... ok          147 ms
test deadlock-soft-2              ... ok         5154 ms
test deadlock-parallel            ... ok          132 ms
test detach-partition-concurrently-1 ... ok          553 ms
test detach-partition-concurrently-2 ... ok          234 ms
test detach-partition-concurrently-3 ... ok         2389 ms
test detach-partition-concurrently-4 ... ok         1876 ms

Any objections to making these new tests line up with the rest?

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple hosts in connection string failed to failover in non-hot standby mode
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names