Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names
Date
Msg-id 20210609021735.doepevxigys7ucar@nol
Whole thread Raw
In response to Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:57:45PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> test deadlock-simple              ... ok           20 ms
> test deadlock-hard                ... ok        10624 ms
> test deadlock-soft                ... ok          147 ms
> test deadlock-soft-2              ... ok         5154 ms
> test deadlock-parallel            ... ok          132 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-1 ... ok          553 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-2 ... ok          234 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-3 ... ok         2389 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-4 ... ok         1876 ms
> 
> Any objections to making these new tests line up with the rest?

No objection, as the output is still way under 80 characters.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names