Re: Handing off SLRU fsyncs to the checkpointer - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Handing off SLRU fsyncs to the checkpointer
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGL-O4JBdjgNHxe8T9mN8SgS6CLttg-44F5pAOkRcJ6yRQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Handing off SLRU fsyncs to the checkpointer  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Handing off SLRU fsyncs to the checkpointer
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 5:06 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the meantime, from the low-hanging-fruit department, here's a new
> version of the SLRU-fsync-offload patch.  The only changes are a
> tweaked commit message, and adoption of C99 designated initialisers
> for the function table, so { [SYNC_HANDLER_CLOG] = ... } instead of
> relying on humans to make the array order match the enum values.  If
> there are no comments or objections, I'm planning to commit this quite
> soon.

... and CI told me that Windows didn't like my array syntax with the
extra trailing comma.  Here's one without.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: XversionUpgrade tests broken by postfix operator removal
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove useless distinct clauses