Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: check_strxfrm_bug() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: check_strxfrm_bug()
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGJrdk12oxMZgbdQt_Ca7gp_mWEPXzwQ6B97BBv=tfTsXQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: check_strxfrm_bug()  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: check_strxfrm_bug()  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Re: check_strxfrm_bug()  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 2:31 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
> To be clear, is the proposal to remove both "check_strxfrm_bug" and
> "TRUST_STRXFRM"?
>
> Given a bunch of folks who have expertise in this area of code all agree
> with removing the above as part of the collation cleanups targeted for
> v16, I'm inclined to agree. I don't really see the need for an explicit
> RMT action, but based on the consensus this seems OK to add as an open item.

Thanks all.  I went ahead and removed check_strxfrm_bug().

I could write a patch to remove the libc strxfrm support, but since
Jeff recently wrote new code in 16 to abstract that stuff, he might
prefer to look at it?

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove io prefix from pg_stat_io columns
Next
From: "jacktby@gmail.com"
Date:
Subject: Howdoes; pg; index; page; optimize; dead; tuples?;