On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Hmm, maybe I should be considering a pair of macros instead --
> UTILITY_START_DROP and UTILITY_END_DROP. I'll give this a try. Other
> ideas are welcome.
That seems like a possibly promising idea. I do wonder how well any
of this is going to scale. Presumably people are going to want
similar things for CREATE and (hardest) ALTER. Seems like
ProcessUtility() could get pretty messy and confusing. But I don't
have a better idea, either. :-(
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
