Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZMV2jy3tCwjNG7GC2_xyL_ZExd=NPOu3KgeiXj3BY3rQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 2:15 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> But let's ignore the case of pg_upgrade and just consider a dump/restore.
> I'd still say that unless you give --no-toast-compression then I would
> expect the dump/restore to preserve the tables' old compression behavior.
> Robert's argument that the pre-v14 database had no particular compression
> behavior seems nonsensical to me.  We know exactly which compression
> behavior it has.

I said that it didn't have a state, not that it didn't have a
behavior. That's not exactly the same thing. But I don't want to argue
about it, either. It's a judgement call what's best here, and I don't
pretend to have all the answers. If you're sure you've got it right
... great!

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Error on failed COMMIT
Next
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_permissions