Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqFmrJGe4eid2EaqnCjjQxrAYR5hJfzc5Cz929WA9p=A+w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thanks for the review.

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> At Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:24:16 +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2017/03/29 23:58, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Amit Langote
>> > <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> >> Looks correct, so incorporated in the attached updated patch.  Thanks.
>> >
>> > This seems like a hacky way to limit the reloptions to just OIDs.
>> > Shouldn't we instead have a new RELOPT_KIND_PARTITIONED or something
>> > like that?
>>
>> OK, I tried that in the updated patch.
>
> The name RELOPT_KIND_PARTITIONED looks somewhat odd. RELKIND for
> partitioned tables is RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE, so is this
> better to be _TABLE, even if a bit longer?

Hm, OK.  Done.

> parseRelOptions seems to return garbage pointer if no option of
> the kind is available.

Oops, fixed that too.

Updated patch attached.

Thanks,
Amit

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Next
From: Peter Moser
Date:
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types