Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Confusing comment in xlog.c or am I missing something? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Confusing comment in xlog.c or am I missing something?
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqFJkOg1mN98vmAwy0nMFq1nfbx89i3kXLY8oU0XcXn+sQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Confusing comment in xlog.c or am I missing something?  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
> Yeah, that would be more correct. The phrase we seem to use elsewhere in
> xlog.c is "crossing a logid boundary".

Should we change it in 9.2 to clear the confusion?

(Attached  is a rather small patch to fix that! :) )

--
Amit Langote

minor-xlog-comment.patch (914 bytes) Download Attachment

View this message in context: Re: Confusing comment in xlog.c or am I missing something?
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavan Deolasee
Date:
Subject: Re: Confusing long option in pg_receivexlog/basebackup/dumpall
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Recovery target 'immediate'