WAL segment not replicated - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Ted EH
Subject WAL segment not replicated
Date
Msg-id CA+G4h2AF43cw9hF1sSDrUHGz92NZiGDnUC4-cDYudFxpuf+zNA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: WAL segment not replicated  (Ian Barwick <ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-admin
I have a 2 node active/standby setup, with synchronous streaming enabled.

WAL segments are replicated as expected on the standby.

However, if I manually kill the postgres process with pkill on the primary I'm ending up with a standby WAL behind that of the primary. The primary seems to be incrementing its WAL automatically after I restart it.

Example: 
Before killing the pg process:
Primary & standby seem to be  synchronizing synchronously:

 pg_last_wal_receive_lsn
-------------------------
 0/5E0108B0
(1 row)

 pg_current_wal_lsn
--------------------
 0/5E0108B0
(1 row)

Now I do "pkill postgres", on the primary the WAL dir has
00000001000000000000005F as the lastest segment (file)  (supposed to be 5E, but unexpectedly getting incremented)
while the standby has:
00000001000000000000005E as its lastest segment 

The problem is if I want to restart the primary as a standby (swapping the roles), it will complain about asking for a WAL too far in the future that is not available on the new primary (old standby):

could not receive data from WAL stream: ERROR:  requested starting point 0/5F000000 is ahead of the WAL flush position of this server 0/5E0CBF38

requested starting point 0/5F000000 is ahead of the WAL flush position of this server 0/5E0D3200

Isn't the primary (original primary) expected to know how far is its standby?

Doing a base backup recovery is not an option for me at this point.

This is "pg_ctl (PostgreSQL) 10.2"

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Rui DeSousa
Date:
Subject: Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network