Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Mark Kirkwood
Subject Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network
Date
Msg-id 06dd8b81-8b1a-ae5c-8ddd-1556b5946176@catalyst.net.nz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network  (Rui DeSousa <rui.desousa@icloud.com>)
Responses Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network  (Rui DeSousa <rui.desousa@icloud.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Hi


On 01/03/18 15:27, Rui DeSousa wrote:
> STS is initialized as 3; and is only set to zero if rsync returns zero.
>
>

Ok, so if that works set correctly then another possibility is the 
archive filesystem (what is that BTW?) not handling out of space 
nicely/properly. I'm thinking this because doing some testing against a 
small ext4 filesystem finds rsync reliably returning 11 when trying to 
copy a file that will not fit (version 3.1.2).

regards
Mark



pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Ted EH
Date:
Subject: WAL segment not replicated
Next
From: Ian Barwick
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL segment not replicated