RE: Enforcing uniqueness on [real estate/postal] addresses - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
Subject RE: Enforcing uniqueness on [real estate/postal] addresses
Date
Msg-id BY5PR09MB4737E536FC48EA3799630BDAF7BF0@BY5PR09MB4737.namprd09.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Enforcing uniqueness on [real estate/postal] addresses  (Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com>)
List pgsql-general
Yup, that's where I was going with the USNG use.

Separate dataset bound to addresses where needed/desired for detailed locating.  And where no address is present, the
USNGbecomes the address. 

Bobb



-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 9:01 AM
To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: RE: Enforcing uniqueness on [real estate/postal] addresses

Think Before You Click: This email originated outside our organization.


On Wed, 13 May 2020, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) wrote:

> Was wondering if you ever thought about binding the textual address to
> a USNG location. https://usngcenter.org/

Bobb, et al.:

Why not have a 'parent' table with entries such as 'Foo Farm' and a 'child'
table with rows for sub-parts of the parent; e.g., 'Barn', 'Field'?

Rich





pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ESQL/C: a ROLLBACK rolls back a COMMITED transaction
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Create user mapping for role