Re: Include WAL in base backup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Include WAL in base backup
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimpoudScpUgu58GvWLMCuZZYpwtAxDJz6ZCXepM@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Include WAL in base backup  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Include WAL in base backup  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>> - Why not initialize logid and logseg like so?:
>>>
>>>        int logid = startptr.xlogid;
>>>        int logseg = startptr.xrecoff / XLogSegSize;
>>>
>>>  Then use those in your elog?  Seems cleaner to me.
>
>> Hmm. Yes. Agreed.
>
> Marginal complaint here: int is the wrong type, I'm pretty sure.

And, we should use XLByteToPrevSeg here instead of just =, I think.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: SSI, simplified
Next
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: multiset patch review