On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
>> We should make trace_recovery_messages available only when
>> the WAL_DEBUG macro was defined?
>
> No, because it's used in a lot of other contexts besides that.
>
>> Currently it's always
>> available, so the standby seems to call elog() too frequently.
>
> Where? I don't see very many messages that would actually get emitted
> at the default setting of the parameter.
Yes. I was just concerned that frequent calls themselves may increase
the overhead.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
