Re: trace_recovery_messages - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: trace_recovery_messages
Date
Msg-id 22539.1276796923@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to trace_recovery_messages  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: trace_recovery_messages  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> We should make trace_recovery_messages available only when
> the WAL_DEBUG macro was defined?

No, because it's used in a lot of other contexts besides that.

> Currently it's always
> available, so the standby seems to call elog() too frequently.

Where?  I don't see very many messages that would actually get emitted
at the default setting of the parameter.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: New PGXN Extension site)
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: to enable O_DIRECT within postgresql