On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 10:20 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> >> We should make trace_recovery_messages available only when
> >> the WAL_DEBUG macro was defined?
> >
> > No, because it's used in a lot of other contexts besides that.
> >
> >> Currently it's always
> >> available, so the standby seems to call elog() too frequently.
> >
> > Where? I don't see very many messages that would actually get emitted
> > at the default setting of the parameter.
>
> Yes. I was just concerned that frequent calls themselves may increase
> the overhead.
Please share your oprofile output so we can see the problem.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
