On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
<stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote:
> I for myself would be rather annoyed if we started quoting all column names
> in our dumps. This is seriously hampering readability and while it is
> already annoying that pg_dump output is slightly different from the original
> DDL used this would make it far worse.
It's only been proposed to make it an option, not to shove it down
anyone's throat.
Given Tom's comments upthread, I suspect that much of this will come
down to whether anyone feels like trying to put in the work to make
this happen, and whether they can come up with a reasonably clean
design that doesn't involve massive code changes. Having not studied
the problem, I don't have an opinion on whether that's possible.
I do agree that the human readability of pg_dump is an asset in many
situations - I have often dumped out the DDL for particular objects
just to look at it, for example. However, I emphatically do NOT agree
that leaving someone with a 500MB dump file (or, for some people on
this list, a whole heck of a lot larger than that) that has to be
manually edited to reload is a useful behavior. It's a huge pain in
the neck.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
