Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Strangely, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP converts to 'now', not now(). Is that a
> problem?
No, it is not, because the text-to-timestamptz conversion is marked
volatile and won't be const-folded. I've always thought it was a very
ugly implementation though, mainly because it doesn't reverse-list
nicely in rule dumps. Sometime we should try to fix it so that it
reverse-lists as "current_timestamp(n)", and likewise for the similar
special cases in gram.y.
regards, tom lane
