Re: MVCC doc improvements - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: MVCC doc improvements
Date
Msg-id 8820.1040144016@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MVCC doc improvements  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Responses Re: MVCC doc improvements
List pgsql-patches
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> Yes, but what I disagree with is the recommendation that "concurrent
> applications" should use B-trees -- a concurrent application that wishes
> to index non-scalar data won't have a lot of success using B-trees,

True, there are cases where you have no choice.  That does not mean that
we should fail to make this recommendation for cases where you have a
choice.

I'm not objecting to improving the text.  I am objecting to deleting it
outright...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: MVCC doc improvements
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: documentation improvements