Re: MVCC doc improvements - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: MVCC doc improvements
Date
Msg-id 1040143400.456.80.camel@tokyo
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MVCC doc improvements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: MVCC doc improvements
List pgsql-patches
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 11:35, Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAICS, that is not a misstatement.  B-trees are still the only
> recommended index type for concurrent-update situations ...
> hash has deadlock issues and the other two are just plain not
> concurrent.

Yes, but what I disagree with is the recommendation that "concurrent
applications" should use B-trees -- a concurrent application that wishes
to index non-scalar data won't have a lot of success using B-trees,
page-level locks or not...

Cheers,

Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC




pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: MVCC doc improvements
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: MVCC doc improvements