"Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I suggested to you awhile back that we could keep a typedef file on the
> repository, saving one step.
That kind of sucks since it means you get conflicts when you update if you've
run it yourself.
Is there a reason we can't write makefiles which generate this file?
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!