Re: Python 3.1 support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Pye
Subject Re: Python 3.1 support
Date
Msg-id 7C7670E6-3CB1-46BE-89C9-7226AF2BFF19@jwp.name
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Python 3.1 support  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Python 3.1 support
List pgsql-hackers
On Nov 19, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> But you wouldn't, for example, get away with breaking SQL (or even
> improving it incompatibly) to facilitate a better elog.

This doesn't fit the situation.

I'm not breaking PL/Python. I'm trying to add PL/Python3. =)

> I think of a PL/Python function as a Python script file stored
> in the database.

For Python, I think that's a mistake. Python scripts are independent applications.

[tho, I think this does illuminate our perspectives...]

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about ECPGset_noind_null() and ECPGis_noind_null()
Next
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about ECPGset_noind_null() and ECPGis_noind_null()