Re: Python 3.1 support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Python 3.1 support
Date
Msg-id 1258700563.28720.1.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Python 3.1 support  (James Pye <lists@jwp.name>)
Responses Re: Python 3.1 support
List pgsql-hackers
On tor, 2009-11-19 at 13:12 -0700, James Pye wrote:
> > I think of a PL/Python function as a Python script file stored
> > in the database.
> 
> For Python, I think that's a mistake. Python scripts are independent applications.

Is there any precedent for the sort of behavior that you are
implementing, that is, automatic sharing of variables between
independent executions of the same source container?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: enable-thread-safety defaults?