Re: Python 3.1 support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Pye
Subject Re: Python 3.1 support
Date
Msg-id 0B9FDD69-C43E-48B6-B7AA-2782939C1DDD@jwp.name
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Python 3.1 support  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Python 3.1 support
List pgsql-hackers
On Nov 20, 2009, at 12:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Is there any precedent for the sort of behavior that you are
> implementing, that is, automatic sharing of variables between
> independent executions of the same source container?

import foo

# bar is a regular, def'd function.
foo.bar()

...

# even in another thread, doesn't matter..
foo.bar()


In either call, foo.bar()'s globals() is the same dictionary object(the foo module's dictionary).

A plpython3 function *is* a Python module.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Python 3.1 support