Re: The command tag of "ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW RENAME COLUMN" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: The command tag of "ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW RENAME COLUMN"
Date
Msg-id 7577.1572963560@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The command tag of "ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW RENAME COLUMN"  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: The command tag of "ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW RENAME COLUMN"  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm thinking to commit the patch. But I have one question; is it ok to
> back-patch? Since the patch changes the command tags for some commands,
> for example, which might break the existing event trigger functions
> using TG_TAG if we back-patch it. Or we should guarantee the compatibility of
> command tag within the same major version?

I would not back-patch this.  I don't think it's enough of a bug
to justify taking any compatibility risks for.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-