Re: The command tag of "ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW RENAME COLUMN" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: The command tag of "ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW RENAME COLUMN"
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwFUPtg-YnrWAAXikQ-7HAXr-oDaSLQ=C7Dta4Bika_KHA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The command tag of "ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW RENAME COLUMN"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:19 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> > I'm thinking to commit the patch. But I have one question; is it ok to
> > back-patch? Since the patch changes the command tags for some commands,
> > for example, which might break the existing event trigger functions
> > using TG_TAG if we back-patch it. Or we should guarantee the compatibility of
> > command tag within the same major version?
>
> I would not back-patch this.  I don't think it's enough of a bug
> to justify taking any compatibility risks for.

+1
I committed the patch only to the master. Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: cost based vacuum (parallel)
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdw message.