On 8/10/21 10:13 PM, Mark Dilger wrote:
>
>> On Aug 10, 2021, at 7:11 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>
>> If we were publishing them on CPAN that would be reasonable. But we're
>> not, nor are we likely to, I believe.
> I'm now trying to understand the purpose of the renaming. I thought the problem was that RPM packagers wanted
somethingthat was unlikely to collide. Publishing on CPAN would be the way to claim the namespace.
>
> What's the purpose of this idea then? If there isn't one, I'd rather just keep the current names.
Yes we want them to be in a namespace where they are unlikely to collide
with anything else. No, you don't have to publish on CPAN to achieve that.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
