On 8/10/21 10:26 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 8/10/21 10:13 PM, Mark Dilger wrote:
>>> On Aug 10, 2021, at 7:11 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> If we were publishing them on CPAN that would be reasonable. But we're
>>> not, nor are we likely to, I believe.
>> I'm now trying to understand the purpose of the renaming. I thought the problem was that RPM packagers wanted
somethingthat was unlikely to collide. Publishing on CPAN would be the way to claim the namespace.
>>
>> What's the purpose of this idea then? If there isn't one, I'd rather just keep the current names.
>
>
> Yes we want them to be in a namespace where they are unlikely to collide
> with anything else. No, you don't have to publish on CPAN to achieve that.
>
Incidentally, not publishing on CPAN was a major reason given a few
years ago for using fairly lax perlcritic policies. If we publish these
on CPAN now some people at least might want to revisit that decision.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
