Hi,
Can you check what is returned by the back end for 9.5 and 9.6. You
will need to set
logLevel=2
That will help to narrow down the problem.
Jeremy
On 13/10/16 14:24, Tillmann Schulz wrote:
> The docu says:
> If the driver continues processing after a failure (and this is the case in my example),
BatchUpdateException.getUpdateCountswill have an element for every command.
>
> In my case there is an element for every command but all elements contain -3 (Statement.Execute_Failed) in postgres
9.6.
>
> I think only the failed statmements should been marked with -3! This behaviour is new in 9.6 and seems to be a bug.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Tillmann
>
>
>> According to the doco, getUpdateCounts():-
>>
>> Returns:
>> an array of int containing the update counts for the updates that
>> were executed successfully before this error occurred. Or, if the
>> driver continues to process commands after an error, one of the
>> following for every command in the batch:
>>
>> 1. an update count
>> 2. Statement.SUCCESS_NO_INFO to indicate that the command executed
>> successfully but the number of rows affected is unknown
>> 3. Statement.EXECUTE_FAILED to indicate that the command failed to
>> execute successfully
>>
>>
>> I do not know if the Postgres "driver continues to process commands
>> after an error" but if it does then the array should contain 10 entries
>> and one would have the "Statement.EXECUTE_FAILED".
>>
>> Tomorrow, I'll dig a bit deeper if nobody else can explain this.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Rob
>
