Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> writes:
> Hadi Moshayedi <hadi@moshayedi.net> wrote:
>> I also noticed that this patch makes matview test fail. It seems
>> that it just changes the ordering of rows for queries like
>> "SELECT * FROM tv;". Does this seem like a bug in my patch, or
>> should we add "ORDER BY" clauses to this test to make it more
>> deterministic?
> I added some ORDER BY clauses.� That is probably a good thing
> anyway for purposes of code coverage.� Does that fix it for you?
Uh, what? Fooling around with the implementation of avg() should surely
not change any planning decisions.
regards, tom lane