jd@commandprompt.com ("Joshua D. Drake") writes:
> Harald Armin Massa wrote:
>> Josh,
>>
>> What should the "theme" of this release be? Performance seems like the
>>> obvious one, but rather predictable. Is there any other tack we could
>>> take?
>>>
>>> If the Visual C buildability does make it, I suggest we also stress that
>> point. Whatever somebody thinks about windows, it is a very well known
>> platform; and "compilability with a Microsoft Compiler" can give some good
>> impressions with nontech management.
>
> Hmmm we may be able to spin (did I actually write that) this...
>
> I think that stating MSVC capability isn't worth much... but:
>
> Greater Win32 scalability through native 64bit Win32 support and MSVC
> native compilation.
>
> Yes the Win32 twice is redundant but I can hear the roars now...
You need to have it added in twice in order to get up to the full 64
bits ;-).
[As the crowd roars, again...]
--
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "linuxfinances.info")
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/x.html
No lusers were harmed in the creation of this usenet article. AND I
WANT TO KNOW WHY NOT!
-- glmar0@twirl.mcc.ac.uk in alt.sysadmin.recovery
