Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage
Date
Msg-id 5ccec641-9c06-6083-c22e-931fa99f3e81@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11.08.22 19:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> On 2022-08-11 10:52:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> -- I won't be too surprised if we get pushback on that after 15.0 is out.
> 
>>  From what angle?
> 
> If I knew that, it'd be because we'd already received the pushback.
> I'm just suspicious that very little beta testing happens on Windows,
> and what does is probably mostly people running up-to-date Windows.
> So I think there's plenty of chance for "hey, this no longer works"
> complaints later.  Maybe we'll be able to reject it all with "sorry,
> we desupported that version of Windows", but I dunno.

What is changing in PG15 about this?  Unix-domain sockets on Windows are 
supported as of PG13.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: fix typos
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage