Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE
Date
Msg-id 5C96BC29.1000509@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE
List pgsql-hackers
On 03/23/19 18:22, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Out of curiosity, what further processing would you expect libxml to do?
> 
> Hm, I'd have thought it'd try to parse the arguments to some extent,
> but maybe not.  Does everybody reimplement attribute parsing for
> themselves when using PIs?

Yeah, the content of a PI (whatever's after the target name) is left
all to be defined by whatever XML-using application might care about
that PI.

It could have an attribute=value syntax inspired by XML elements, or
some other form entirely, but there'd just better not be any ?> in it.

Regards,
-Chap


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding a TAP test checking data consistency on standby with minRecoveryPoint