Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id 5417.1071458370@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>)
Responses Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> writes:
>> Doesn't matter.  Catalog entries are dumped and reloaded; there is no
>> carry-forward of OIDs.

> Large objects included?

No.  Large object OIDs are preserved in the given proposal.

(Note to self: I wonder whether the recently-added COMMENT ON LARGE
OBJECT facility works at all over dump/reload...)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ORDER BY and DISTINCT ON
Next
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade