On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:48:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > What about cached OIDs in view and function definitions, etc...?
>
> Doesn't matter. Catalog entries are dumped and reloaded; there is no
> carry-forward of OIDs.
>
> I suppose if someone were storing OIDs of tables or functions or views
> in user tables, this procedure would break the references. But that
> would be true of a dump/reload under current procedures as well. I'm
> willing to say that that's unsupported.
Large objects included?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
FOO MANE PADME HUM
