Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id 3FDD2A57.2060803@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> No.  Large object OIDs are preserved in the given proposal.
> 
> (Note to self: I wonder whether the recently-added COMMENT ON LARGE
> OBJECT facility works at all over dump/reload...)

How do you mean?  pg_dump never writes out the COMMENT ON commands...

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch