On 02/11/2014 08:17 AM, AlexK wrote:
> I would like to give my users the ability to invoke read-only functions and
> select statements, so that they can easily see the data. Both me and the
> users have experience mostly with SQL Server, so anyone can keep like 30
> connections without much thinking.
Trying to think why one person would need 30 connections to do simple
queries instead of running them through one connection?
>
> Since too many open connections seems to be a serious problem on PostgreSql,
> maybe giving everyone PgAdmin is asking for trouble. Instead, I would like
> to expose the data via some simple Web-based interface, managing the
> connections myself.
So have you seen a problem?
Also if you have, would it not be easier just to put a connection pooler
in front of the database? Say pgBouncer or pgpool, then you would be
covered for all methods of access.
>
> Can you recommend something very simple and light-weight, with only one
> feature: run a query and display a result set.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Simple-Web-based-alternative-to-PgAdmin-tp5791430.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@gmail.com
