Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch. - Mailing list pgsql-ports

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch.
Date
Msg-id 5211.1036643908@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch.  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch.  ("Billy G. Allie" <bga@mug.org>)
List pgsql-ports
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I am fine with this because it only touches unixware-specific stuff,
> except the change to Tom's inline function:
>   [static] inline Datum
>   myFunctionCall2(FmgrInfo *flinfo, Datum arg1, Datum arg2)
> Tom will have to comment on that.

That change would actively break some platforms (see C99 inline
specifications).  Why is it necessary for SCO?  We certainly have
plenty of other static inline functions ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-ports by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch.
Next
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a patch.