Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Karol Trzcionka
Subject Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax
Date
Msg-id 5182A82A.8060001@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
W dniu 02.05.2013 19:40, Tom Lane pisze:
>> BEFORE/AFTER seems more logical to me.
> Works for me.
>
What do you think about function- or cast-like syntax. I mean:
RETURNING OLD(foo.bar)
or RETURNING OLD(foo).bar
or RETURNING (foo::OLD).bar ?
I think none of them should conflict with any other statements.
Regards,
Karol Trzcionka

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] add long options to pgbench (submission 1)