Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax
Date
Msg-id 28565.1367516459@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax  (Karol Trzcionka <karlikt@gmail.com>)
Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:28:53PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
>> prior/after? Both are unreserved keywords atm and it seems far less
>> likely to have conflicts than new/old.

> BEFORE/AFTER seems more logical to me.

Works for me.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax
Next
From: Karol Trzcionka
Date:
Subject: Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax