Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax
Date
Msg-id 121.1367520448@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax  (Karol Trzcionka <karlikt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Karol Trzcionka <karlikt@gmail.com> writes:
> What do you think about function- or cast-like syntax. I mean:
> RETURNING OLD(foo.bar)
> or RETURNING OLD(foo).bar
> or RETURNING (foo::OLD).bar ?
> I think none of them should conflict with any other statements.

I think you'll find those alternatives are at least as ugly to
implement as they are to look at ...
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax
Next
From: Karol Trzcionka
Date:
Subject: Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax