Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Derek Rodner |
---|---|
Subject | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
Date | |
Msg-id | 51494DB187D98F4C88DBEBF1F5F6D423022518C5@edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
List | pgsql-advocacy |
Peter, Lukas, et al, What I would like to convey to the community is that this release is not targeted at you. You are already Postgres experts. You all already know how this works and have intimate knowledge of all of the contrib modules and add-ons. You are the experts. This release is designed for the developer who has never used PostgreSQL before. He may have heard of it and how it is better than MySQL. But, in the past, he has opted for MySQL because it is a simple download and ready for deployment in his eyes. This release is intended for those folks. For example, take a look at ohloh.net. MySQL is the 5th highest rated project. PostgreSQL is rated much lower. Don't we want that to be reversed? In my entire life, I have always been the underdog and I thrive on that. My college basketball team is always the underdog. EnterpriseDB is the underdog to Oracle. Postgres is the underdog to MySQL. I am starting to get sick of that and want Postgres to stop being the underdog. We know we are better than MySQL. Most of the world knows we are better than MySQL. We are tying to bring Postgres to the masses so they can really understand it. Anyone who is already familiar with Postgres or any real DBA is going to build it himself from the Postgres community and he will be able to do it quickly. While the wording of the press release is cause for concern in the community because of "first-ever" and "professional grade", we need to do this for marketing purposes. If we had said "EnterpriseDB releases yet another PostgreSQL distribution" then no one would cover it. We are trying to help PostgreSQL, and in turn, help ourselves. I would be interested to see how the hits on www.postgresql.org and www.slony.info, etc. increased since this announcement. Derek M. Rodner Director, Product Strategy EnterpriseDB Corporation 732.331.1333 office 484.252.1943 cell www.enterprisedb.com -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 8:36 AM To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Cc: Lukas Kahwe Smith Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] EnterpriseDB Postgres Am Mittwoch, 8. August 2007 17:14 schrieb Lukas Kahwe Smith: > I read about EnterpriseDB PostGres [1] today. Guess since its open > source it does not contain DynaTune (or what their auto tuning feature > for EnterpriseDB is called). Might be a nice addition to be able to get > this unbundled as a binary .. for this distribution? At any rate another > PostgreSQL distribution, well not another actually its "the first-ever > professional-grade distribution". It's basically PostgreSQL and regular add-on components installed in an unusual way. Certainly not the first, and arguably not professional. http://people.planetpostgresql.org/peter/index.php?/archives/9-Enterpris eDB-and-the-Professional-Grade.html -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
pgsql-advocacy by date: