Re: Problem running "ALTER TABLE...", ALTER TABLE waiting - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Brian McNally
Subject Re: Problem running "ALTER TABLE...", ALTER TABLE waiting
Date
Msg-id 502553B9.1080900@uw.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problem running "ALTER TABLE...", ALTER TABLE waiting  (Sergey Konoplev <sergey.konoplev@postgresql-consulting.com>)
List pgsql-general
In an interesting twist, we tried to drop the table in question and got
this:

-bash-3.2$ dropdb exomeSNP
dropdb: database removal failed: ERROR:  database "exomeSNP" is being
accessed by other users
DETAIL:  There are 1 prepared transaction(s) using the database.
-bash-3.2$

So, it seems that maybe there is  prepared transaction that could be
holding up the ALTER TABLE. I'm a bit confused though since previous
attempts to find that didn't succeed. Maybe I just haven't used to
correct query yet.

--
Brian McNally

On 08/09/2012 12:30 AM, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Brian McNally <bmcnally@uw.edu> writes:
>>> Ok, I'm running with all available updates and kernel 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5
>>> but am still having the same problem.
>>
>> It's fairly clearly blocked on a lock ... have you looked into the
>> pg_locks view to see what is holding the lock?
>
> There is a hidden part of the conversation. We have already checked
> pg_locks and no locks were there. Moreover there were no other
> activity except the ALTER. And this was the odd part.
>
>> (I'm wondering about a prepared transaction, myself.  There isn't much
>> else that could hold a lock across a server restart.)
>
> Are not they shown by pg_locks?
>
>>
>>                          regards, tom lane
>
>
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: François Beausoleil
Date:
Subject: Re: slowness what only full vacuum can solve
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Mailsystem maintenance/migration announcement