Re: speeding up planning with partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: speeding up planning with partitions
Date
Msg-id 4f049572-9440-3c99-afa1-f7ca7f38fe80@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: speeding up planning with partitions  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: speeding up planning with partitions  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019/04/02 14:50, Amit Langote wrote:
> Attached patch is only for HEAD this time.  I'll post one for PG 11 (if
> you'd like) once we reach consensus on the best thing to do here is.

While we're on the topic of the relation between constraint exclusion and
partition pruning, I'd like to (re-) propose this documentation update
patch.  The partitioning chapter in ddl.sgml says update/delete of
partitioned tables uses constraint exclusion internally to emulate
partition pruning, which is no longer true as of 428b260f8.

The v2-0001 patch hasn't changed.

Thanks,
Amit

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: A separate table level option to control compression