Re: speeding up planning with partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: speeding up planning with partitions
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f8bmUGxUSYq6dOEA7Y8RgtYyrXd=oz1av6uKu1F0SYSUw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: speeding up planning with partitions  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: speeding up planning with partitions
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 19:50, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> While we're on the topic of the relation between constraint exclusion and
> partition pruning, I'd like to (re-) propose this documentation update
> patch.  The partitioning chapter in ddl.sgml says update/delete of
> partitioned tables uses constraint exclusion internally to emulate
> partition pruning, which is no longer true as of 428b260f8.

Update-docs-that-update-delete-no-longer-use-cons.patch looks good to
me. It should be changed as what the docs say is no longer true.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Next
From: Ashwin Agrawal
Date:
Subject: Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage