get rid of Abs() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject get rid of Abs()
Date
Msg-id 4beb42b5-216b-bce8-d452-d924d5794c63@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: get rid of Abs()
Re: get rid of Abs()
List pgsql-hackers
I was wondering why we have a definition of Abs() in c.h when there are 
more standard functions such as abs() and fabs() in widespread use.  I 
think this one is left over from pre-ANSI-C days.  The attached patches 
replace all uses of Abs() with more standard functions.

The first patch installs uses of abs() and fabs().  These are already in 
use in the tree and should be straightforward.

The next two patches install uses of llabs() and fabsf(), which are not 
in use yet.  But they are in C99.

The last patch removes the definition of Abs().


Fun fact: The current definition

     #define Abs(x)         ((x) >= 0 ? (x) : -(x))

is slightly wrong for floating-point values.  Abs(-0.0) returns -0.0, 
but fabs(-0.0) returns +0.0.
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC tables - use designated initializers
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: log_heap_visible(): remove unused parameter and update comment