Re: pl/python refactoring - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Urbański
Subject Re: pl/python refactoring
Date
Msg-id 4D379AED.1020000@wulczer.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/python refactoring  (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>)
Responses Re: pl/python refactoring  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: pl/python refactoring  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 20/01/11 01:26, Jan Urbański wrote:
> On 19/01/11 10:57, Jan Urbański wrote:
>> On 18/01/11 23:22, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> #2: It looks like this loses some information/formatting in the error
>>> message.  Should we keep the pointing arrow there?
>
>>>  CONTEXT:  PL/Python function "sql_syntax_error"
>>> -ERROR:  syntax error at or near "syntax"
>>> -LINE 1: syntax error
>>> -        ^
>>> -QUERY:  syntax error
>>> +ERROR:  PL/Python: plpy.SPIError: syntax error at or near "syntax"
>>>  CONTEXT:  PL/Python function "sql_syntax_error"
>
>> Yes, the message is less informative, because the error is reported by
>> PL/Python, by wrapping the SPI message. I guess I could try to extract
>> more info from the caught ErrorData and put it in the new error that
>> PL/Python throws.
>
> All right, I found a way to shoehorn the extra information into
> SPIException, I'll post a new patch series with what's left of the
> general refactoring patch soon.

Here's an updated patch series for PL/Python refactoring. It was 16
patches at first, 8 are committed, 1 got dropped, so we're down to 7.

Cheers,
Jan

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: REVIEW: "writable CTEs" - doc patch
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: REVIEW: "writable CTEs" - doc patch