Joshua Tolley wrote:
>>> The basics seem to be there, with at least one notable
>>> exception, namely that plperl functions can do stuff only plperlu should do. I
>>> presume this is because I really don't understand yet how plperl's trusted
>>> interpreter initialization works, and have simply copied what looked like
>>> important stuff from the original plperl call handler.
>>>
>>>
>> I'll check that out.
>>
>
>
>
Ok, I have a handle on the trusted/nontrusted issue. But I think the
piece that's missing here is that it needs to save the calling context
etc. and use PG_TRY() and friends, just like plperl_call_handler(). I'll
work on that.
cheers
andrew
