"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> BTW, is it the case that room maps to = and during maps to && in this
> example? If so, wouldn't it make more sense to combine them?
> EXCLUSION (room WITH =, during WITH &&)
I think so too. Keeping the expression and the associated operator
together seems more readable and less error-prone than having them
separated by other columns.
BTW, where is the optional opclass name going to fit in? ("There
isn't one" is not an acceptable answer.)
regards, tom lane
