On Nov 6, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Right now, I am leaning toward Form 2, and EXCLUSION/BY. So the
> typical
> case would read like:
>
> EXCLUSION USING gist (room, during) BY (=, &&)
I like this, but like EXCLUDE better
EXCLUDE USING gist (room, during) BY (=, &&)
Is your objection to EXCLUDE for cases when there is no USING clause?
EXLUDE (room, during) BY (=, &&)
Yes, I can see how that'd be a bit more confusing. So EXCLUSION
probably is best.
BTW, is it the case that room maps to = and during maps to && in this
example? If so, wouldn't it make more sense to combine them?
EXCLUSION (room WITH =, during WITH &&)
Or am I misunderstanding how this works (quite likely, I'm sure).
Best,
David
